Page history
2 January 2017
→Process9: Changed reference to firmlaunch-hax to be more searchable in the section about safefirmhax.
+1
more info
m+10
→Process9
+159
a few people found it independently
-50
no edit summary
m+31
→Process9
+349
30 December 2016
Undoing because of lack of details.
-920
→boot9: Removed nedwill because nedwill didn't discover any of the two. Also fixed a huge factual mistake I still think is true?
-107
no edit summary
+1,028
vectors -> uninitialized ram has been exploited.
-85
27 December 2016
19 December 2016
28 November 2016
15 November 2016
6 November 2016
4 November 2016
26 October 2016
→Kernel11: Fix duplicated entry.
-530
→Kernel11: slowhax
+904
→arm9loader
→Process9
→Standalone Sysmodules
+516
no edit summary
-312
no edit summary
+1
no edit summary
+14
no edit summary
-3
→Kernel11
+300
25 October 2016
28 September 2016
The description still sucked. Lots of ambiguity with arm9loaderhax, OTP hash is relevant only to enhanced-arm9loaderhax and rearranging useless w/o the original arm9loaderhax flaw.
-99
Undo revision 18311 by Shinyquagsire23 (talk) I don't agree, using AES ECB is an implementation vulnerability.
+472
27 September 2016
Let's be honest—The real flaw is that they never fixed the missing verification block.
-472
hopefully stop the edit wars :P
m-72
no edit summary
+51
no edit summary
m+53
→arm9loader
m-7
→arm9loader: Yep
m+25
→arm9loader
m+34
→arm9loader
-1
→arm9loader
+725