Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
628 bytes added ,  04:31, 28 June 2013
m
i know that but have you ever made a try?
Line 74: Line 74:  
:::::I forgot that hours ago. sorry. I thought we would be able to feed those raw data we got from CDN, and let it decrypt and extract for us. then at least we may be able to find those differences in modules implemented between two nearby versions. Some just fix crash - stablility, and some would fix some vulnerables we may use, and some would indicates those internal logical process of the module's implementation. we can not always rely on those ROP or other black-box methods. when we get the opportunity to build a CFW or a special homebrew that would affect the original behaviours of the system, we may need to modify it right? also that should show us some interesting points if we have ones dedicated on analysing those. --[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] 14:51, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
 
:::::I forgot that hours ago. sorry. I thought we would be able to feed those raw data we got from CDN, and let it decrypt and extract for us. then at least we may be able to find those differences in modules implemented between two nearby versions. Some just fix crash - stablility, and some would fix some vulnerables we may use, and some would indicates those internal logical process of the module's implementation. we can not always rely on those ROP or other black-box methods. when we get the opportunity to build a CFW or a special homebrew that would affect the original behaviours of the system, we may need to modify it right? also that should show us some interesting points if we have ones dedicated on analysing those. --[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] 14:51, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
 
::::::Total-control code exec haxx = access to the [[AES]] engine obviously. "build a 'CFW'" That's not possible because of [[NCCH|RSA]], the only way around that would be to exploit software while the system is booting or exploit Home Menu. And patching the NCCH signature checks(from like savegame haxx with a game) is rather pointless, because you would have to re-patch *every* time you boot your 3DS(there's no need to run a regular homebrew application via NCCH this way either tbh). --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 16:06, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
 
::::::Total-control code exec haxx = access to the [[AES]] engine obviously. "build a 'CFW'" That's not possible because of [[NCCH|RSA]], the only way around that would be to exploit software while the system is booting or exploit Home Menu. And patching the NCCH signature checks(from like savegame haxx with a game) is rather pointless, because you would have to re-patch *every* time you boot your 3DS(there's no need to run a regular homebrew application via NCCH this way either tbh). --[[User:Yellows8|Yellows8]] 16:06, 27 June 2013 (CEST)
 
+
:::::Thx. That's exactly how cfw works. (sorry i only have psp and 3ds) procfw on psp, have ipl flashed (psp has one special section inside its battery) can auto-patch the cfw code into the system while booting. But have no news for how those men repair customer's device i definitely have no clubs about the existence of similiar mechism. Besides, patching is not that easy, well. i know you have full access to AES engine, and i just want to know have you ever tried or thought of using contents from CDN and decrypt them and disassemble to seek something interesting. --[[User:Syphurith|Syphurith]] 05:31, 28 June 2013 (CEST)
 
===Spam attack===
 
===Spam attack===
 
I guess the simple captcha isn't enough, do you have an idea what to do? (i'm asking you because you are the most active admin here).<br/>
 
I guess the simple captcha isn't enough, do you have an idea what to do? (i'm asking you because you are the most active admin here).<br/>
174

edits

Navigation menu