Talk:Services: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Infinicore (talk | contribs) Service notation suggestion |
Infinicore (talk | contribs) m →Service Command Notation: Forgot my signature |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There seems to be some disagreement on how to notate commands on services. Some people do this: AMNet:OpenTicket (as done by the wiki for page naming), others do am:net::OpenTicket. | There seems to be some disagreement on how to notate commands on services. Some people do this: AMNet:OpenTicket (as done by the wiki for page naming), others do am:net::OpenTicket. | ||
I'd like to propose that the wiki page naming continues with all-uppercase service names followed by initial uppercase port name (i.e., am:net -> AMNet, act:u -> ACTU, and so on), but that they are used in text to be more precise: am:net#OpenTicket, act:u#GetAccountDataBlock. This is loosely modeled after Ruby and Javadoc method notation. | I'd like to propose that the wiki page naming continues with all-uppercase service names followed by initial uppercase port name (i.e., am:net -> AMNet, act:u -> ACTU, and so on), but that they are used in text to be more precise: am:net#OpenTicket, act:u#GetAccountDataBlock. This is loosely modeled after Ruby and Javadoc method notation. [[User:Infinicore|Infinicore]] ([[User talk:Infinicore|talk]]) 09:15, 2 January 2016 (CET) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:15, 2 January 2016
Service Command Notation
There seems to be some disagreement on how to notate commands on services. Some people do this: AMNet:OpenTicket (as done by the wiki for page naming), others do am:net::OpenTicket.
I'd like to propose that the wiki page naming continues with all-uppercase service names followed by initial uppercase port name (i.e., am:net -> AMNet, act:u -> ACTU, and so on), but that they are used in text to be more precise: am:net#OpenTicket, act:u#GetAccountDataBlock. This is loosely modeled after Ruby and Javadoc method notation. Infinicore (talk) 09:15, 2 January 2016 (CET)